Is Ocasio-Cortez Right to Hate Capitalism?
There are many who speak loudly against capitalism, all the while still enjoying its benefits. To illustrate this point, just look at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez texting from her iPhone, wearing a Movado watch and drinking a Starbucks coffee. A democratic socialist, who thinks of capitalism as an immoral system, seems to enjoy the goods provided by big corporations. It is not only Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, however; this is common behavior in western societies.
This behavior derives from the confusion between political ideology and practical politics. Political ideology is a theoretical framework of how society should work, whereas practical politics is the actual implementation of these ideas in the real world. Because of this confusion, people fall into two fallacies. First, they focus on the ideological principles rather than the practicalities. Second, they judge policies by their intentions rather than their results.
Starting with the first fallacy, take the example of the term ‘’capitalism’’. Countries such as the USA, Canada and Sweden are, in principle, capitalist countries, despite the fact that they differ tremendously in terms of economic and social policies. Nevertheless, people view “capitalism” as something negative, and universal in its definition and applications.
The majority thinks of capitalism as it was perceived in 19th century; a system associated with the unrestrained power of big corporations and the exploitation of the working class. That’s why many free market advocates, in order to distinguish capitalism from this negative connotation, use other terms, such as free market capitalism, crony capitalism, etc.
A survey conducted by the Harvard Kennedy School showed that most Americans aged 18 – 29 don’t support capitalism, while not supporting socialism either. Specifically, 42% of young Americans support capitalism, and 33% support socialism.
While, in principle, capitalism is related to private property, voluntary exchange, operation for profit, and free markets, it is not perceived as such. According to another poll the vast majority of people tend to agree with the statement, “Most people are better off in a free market economy, even though some people are rich and some are poor.” Although people disagree with capitalism, they seem to agree with the results it produces.
The second fallacy comes through judging policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results. The famous saying “That wasn’t real communism” finds its roots in this particular fallacy. In contrast to nazism, an ideology associated with racism and hatred, communism was presented by Marx as a goal for an ideal society, where everyone would be equal, with Socialism being the transition to communism (at least, according to Lenin).
Based on this premise, the crimes and failures of communist regimes are discarded, because they don’t fit with the ideal society Marx described. Political assassinations, forced-labor camps, famines and mass killings are thought of as not real communism and disregarded or overlooked by modern socialists. Once again, political ideology is confused with practical politics.
Political ideologies often lead us to fallacies and false conclusions. I suppose that, even if Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez read this article, she probably wouldn’t change her views on capitalism. Nonetheless, if someone tells you that they don’t like capitalism (and they are not wearing a hammer and sickle cockade) ask them what exactly they disagree with. In the end, they might just agree with you.
This piece solely expresses the opinion of the author and not necessarily the organisation as a whole. Students For Liberty is committed to facilitating a broad dialogue for liberty, representing a variety of opinions. If you’re a student interested in presenting your perspective on this blog, click here to submit a guest post!